Skip to Main Content
feedback.corp.metal
Workspace Usability
Created by Ben White
Created on Feb 22, 2023

Improved/Unified On-demand/Reservation Workflow

This idea was imported from Canny. Originally created by: Tony Romero. The current owner is: Miles Thomas.

Currently, instance types must be defined as "on-demand" or "reservation" at build time and built through different workflows. If you try to build a reserved instance and no reservations are available, the build just fails. Would like to see a single workflow where if a server reservation is available, the instance deploys to that reservation. Perhaps something like a tag in the on-demand workflow such as "use_avail_reservation: true"? Where false (default) will act as it currently does and true will check for available reservations before building an on-demand instance and false will just build the on-demand instance without checking for reservations? and/or possibly the reverse scenario for the reservation workflow with a tag like "ondemand_allowed: true" Where again false (default) will act as it currently does and when true, instead of failing when no reservations are available, the workflow will auto-switch over to use an ondemand instance type. Though this 2nd option is understandably "riskier" from a business perspective as a customer might think they're building a reserved instance and get an on-demand one at a higher bill rate instead.
  • +10